Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

On the stability of the infinite Projected Entangled Pair Operator ansatz for driven-dissipative 2D lattices

arXiv
Authors: Dainius Kilda, Alberto Biella, Marco Schiró, Rosario Fazio, Jonathan Keeling

Year

2020

Paper ID

18693

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

74

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present calculations of the time-evolution of the driven-dissipative XYZ model using the infinite Projected Entangled Pair Operator (iPEPO) method, introduced by [A. Kshetrimayum, H. Weimer and R. Orús, Nat. Commun. 8, 1291 (2017)]. We explore the conditions under which this approach reaches a steady state. In particular, we study the conditions where apparently converged calculations may become unstable with increasing bond dimension of the tensor-network ansatz. We discuss how more reliable results could be obtained.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present calculations of the time-evolution of the driven-dissipative XYZ model using the infinite Projected Entangled Pair Operator (iPEPO) method, introduced by [A.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #18693 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ... #69027 Computational Superiority of No...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.