Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Steering Ellipsoid Volume as a Measure on the Two-Qubit States and Associated Separability and Absolute Separability Ratios
arXiv
Authors: Paul B. Slater
Year
2020
Paper ID
18353
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Employing the volume of quantum steering ellipsoids (QSEs) as a measure on the fifteen-dimensional convex set of two-qubit states, we estimate the ratio of the integral of the measure over the separable states to its integral over all (separable and entangled) states to be 0.0288. This can be contrasted with the considerably larger separability ratios (probabilities) of frac{8}{33} = frac{23}{3 cdot 11} approx 0.242424 and frac{25}{341}=frac{52}{11 cdot 31} approx 0.0733138 that various forms of evidence point to with the use of the prominent Hilbert-Schmidt and Bures measures, respectively. The questions of whether the ratio in the QSE setting can be more precisely obtained or even exactly computed, as well as whether a metric can be constructed, the volume element of which yields the measure, remain to be addressed. We also investigate related issues pertaining to absolute separability. Further, we examine the behavior of the separability probability--constant in the Hilbert-Schmidt case and decreasing in the Bures--as a function of the Bloch vector norm in the QSE instance. It appears to increase approaching the pure state boundary.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Employing the volume of quantum steering ellipsoids (QSEs) as a measure on the fifteen-dimensional convex set of two-qubit states, we estimate the ratio of the integral of the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.