Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Local Equivalence Classes of Distance-Hereditary Graphs using Split Decompositions
arXiv
Authors: Nicholas Connolly, Shin Nishio, Kae Nemoto
Year
2026
Paper ID
18121
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
121
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Local complement is a graph operation formalized by Bouchet which replaces the neighborhood of a chosen vertex with its edge-complement. This operation induces an equivalence relation on graphs; determining the size of the resulting equivalence classes is a challenging problem in general. Bouchet obtained formulas only for paths and cycles, and brute-force methods are limited to very small graphs. In this work, we extend these results by deriving explicit formulas for several broad families of distance-hereditary graphs, including complete multipartite graphs, clique-stars, and repeater graphs. Our approach uses a technique known as split decomposition to establish upper bounds on equivalence class sizes, and we prove these bounds are tight through a combinatorial enumeration of the graphs' decomposed structure up to symmetry.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Local complement is a graph operation formalized by Bouchet which replaces the neighborhood of a chosen vertex with its edge-complement.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.