Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Quantum Simulation
Decoder Switching: Breaking the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Real-Time Quantum Error Correction
arXiv
Authors: Riki Toshio, Kaito Kishi, Jun Fujisaki, Hirotaka Oshima, Shintaro Sato, Keisuke Fujii
Year
2025
Paper ID
17936
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
201
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The realization of fault-tolerant quantum computers hinges on the construction of high-speed, high-accuracy, real-time decoding systems. The persistent challenge lies in the fundamental trade-off between speed and accuracy: efforts to improve the decoder's accuracy often lead to unacceptable increases in decoding time and hardware complexity, while attempts to accelerate decoding result in a significant degradation in logical error rate. To overcome this challenge, we propose a novel framework, decoder switching, which balances these competing demands by combining a faster, soft-output decoder ("weak decoder") with a slower, high-accuracy decoder ("strong decoder"). In usual rounds, the weak decoder processes error syndromes and simultaneously evaluates its reliability via soft information. Only when encountering a decoding window with low reliability do we switch to the strong decoder to achieve more accurate decoding. Numerical simulations suggest that this framework can achieve accuracy comparable to, or even surpassing, that of the strong decoder, while maintaining an average decoding time on par with the weak decoder. We also develop an online decoding scheme tailored to our framework, named double window decoding, and elucidate the criteria for preventing an exponential slowdown of quantum computation. These findings break the long-standing speed-accuracy trade-off, paving the way for scalable real-time decoding devices.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.