You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Preferred Basis in Coupled Electron-Nuclear Dynamics
arXiv
Authors: Junhyeok Bang
Year
2025
Paper ID
17524
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
156
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Beyond the adiabatic regime, our understanding of quantum dynamics in coupled systems remains limited, and the choice of representation continues to obscure physical interpretation and simulation accuracy. Here we propose a natural and efficient basis for electron nuclear dynamics by drawing on the concepts of pointer and preferred states from decoherence theory, adapted to systems where electrons and nuclei interact strongly. Within this framework, we show that 1) the independent dynamics exploited by mixed quantum classical (MQC) methods is best understood as a manifestation of entanglement viewed in a preferred basis, rather than a consequence of decoherence, and 2) the adiabatic Born Oppenheimer states satisfy the conditions of an approximate preferred basis. This perspective reconciles widely used approximations with a more fundamental structure of the theory and provides a systematic route to more reliable MQC strategies. In effect, we revisit MQC methods through the lens of preferred states, clarifying when they succeed and how they can be improved.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Beyond the adiabatic regime, our understanding of quantum dynamics in coupled systems remains limited, and the choice of representation continues to obscure physical...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.