Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
A Unified Complexity-Algorithm Account of Constant-Round QAOA Expectation Computation
arXiv
Authors: Jingheng Wang, Shengminjie Chen, Xiaoming Sun, Jialin Zhang
Year
2025
Paper ID
16679
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
190
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is widely studied for combinatorial optimization and has achieved significant advances both in theoretical guarantees and practical performance, yet for general combinatorial optimization problems the expected performance and classical simulability of fixed-round QAOA remain unclear. Focusing on Max-Cut, we first show that for general graphs and any fixed round pge2, exactly evaluating the expectation of fixed-round QAOA at prescribed angles is NP-hard, and that approximating this expectation within additive error 2-O(n) in the number n of vertices is already NP-hard. To evaluate the expected performance of QAOA, we propose a dynamic programming algorithm leveraging tree decomposition. As a byproduct, when the p-local treewidth grows at most logarithmically with the number of vertices, this yields a polynomial-time exact evaluation algorithm in the graph size n. Beyond Max-Cut, we extend the framework to general Binary Unconstrained Combinatorial Optimization (BUCO). Finally, we provide reproducible evaluations for rounds up to p=3 on representative structured families, including the generalized Petersen graph GP(15,2), double-layer triangular 2-lifts, and the truncated icosahedron graph C60, and report cut ratios while benchmarking against locality-matched classical baselines.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is widely studied for combinatorial optimization and has achieved significant advances both in theoretical guarantees and...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.