Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Exchange interaction in gate-defined quantum dots beyond the Hubbard model
arXiv
Authors: Alexander Willmes, Patrick Bethke, M. Mohamed El Kordy Shehata, George Simion, M. A. Wolfe, Tim Botzem, Robert P. G. McNeil, Julian Ritzmann, Arne Ludwig, Andreas D. Wieck, Dieter Schuh, Dominique Bougeard, Hendrik Bluhm
Year
2025
Paper ID
16492
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
87
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A quantitative description of the exchange interaction in quantum dots is relevant for modeling gate operations of spin qubits. By measuring the amplitude and frequency of exchange-driven qubit state oscillations, we measure the detuning dependence of the exchange coupling in a GaAs double quantum dot over three orders of magnitude. Both 1D and 3D full configuration interaction simulations can replicate the observed behavior. Extending a Hubbard model by including excited states increases the range of detuning where it provides a good fit, thus elucidating the underlying physics.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A quantitative description of the exchange interaction in quantum dots is relevant for modeling gate operations of spin qubits.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.