Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Demonstrating the AKLT spectral gap on 2D degree-3 lattices
arXiv
Authors: Nicholas Pomata, Tzu-Chieh Wei
Year
2019
Paper ID
15046
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We establish that the spin-3/2 AKLT model on the honeycomb has a nonzero spectral gap. We use the relation between the anticommutator of two projectors and their sum, and apply it to related AKLT projectors that occupy plaquettes or other extended regions. We analytically reduce the complexity in the resulting eigenvalue problem and use a Lanczos numerical method to show that the required inequality for the nonzero spectral gap holds. This approach is also successfuly applied to several other spin-3/2 AKLT models on degree-3 semiregular tilings, such as the square octagon, star and cross lattices, where the complexity is low enough that exact diagonalization can be used instead of the Lanczos method. In addition, we also close the previously open cases in the singly decorated honeycomb and square lattices.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We establish that the spin-3/2 AKLT model on the honeycomb has a nonzero spectral gap.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.