Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Theory of robust multi-qubit non-adiabatic gates for trapped-ions
arXiv
Authors: Yotam Shapira, Ravid Shaniv, Tom Manovitz, Nitzan Akerman, Lee Peleg, Lior Gazit, Roee Ozeri, Ady Stern
Year
2019
Paper ID
14951
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The prevalent approach to executing quantum algorithms on quantum computers is to break-down the algorithms to a concatenation of universal gates, typically single and two-qubit gates. However such a decomposition results in long gate sequences which are exponential in the qubit register size. Furthermore, gate fidelities tend to decrease when acting in larger qubit registers. Thus high-fidelity implementations in large qubit registers is still a prominent challenge. Here we propose and investigate multi-qubit entangling gates for trapped-ions. Our gates couple many qubits at once, allowing to decrease the total number of gates used while retaining a high gate fidelity. Our method employs all of the normal-modes of motion of the ion chain, which allows to operate outside of the adiabatic regime and at rates comparable to the secular ion-trapping frequency. Furthermore we extend our method for generating Hamiltonians which are suitable for quantum analog simulations, such as a nearest-neighbour spin Hamiltonian or the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger Hamiltonian.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The prevalent approach to executing quantum algorithms on quantum computers is to break-down the algorithms to a concatenation of universal gates, typically single and...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.