Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
On the electron-polaron--electron-polaron scattering and Landau levels in pristine graphene-like quantum electrodynamics
arXiv
Authors: W. B. De Lima, O. M. Del Cima, E. S. Miranda
Year
2019
Paper ID
14315
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The parity-preserving U(1)times U(1) massless QED3 is proposed as a pristine graphene-like planar quantum electrodynamics model. The spectrum content, the degrees of freedom, spin, masses and charges of the quasiparticles (electron-polaron, hole-polaron, photon and Néel quasiparticles) which emerge from the model are discussed. The four-fold broken degeneracy of the Landau levels, similar as the one experimentally observed in pristine graphene submitted to high applied external magnetic fields, is obtained. Furthermore, the model exhibits zero-energy Landau level indicating a kind of anomalous quantum Hall effect. The electron-polaron--electron-polaron scattering potentials in s- and p-wave states mediated by photon and Néel quasiparticles are computed and analyzed. Finally, the model foresees that two electron-polarons (s-wave state) belonging to inequivalent mathbf{K} and mathbf{Kprime} points in the Brillouin zone might exhibit attractive interaction, while two electron-polarons (p-wave state) lying both either in mathbf{K} or in mathbf{Kprime} points experience repulsive interaction.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The parity-preserving U(1)times U(1) massless QED3 is proposed as a pristine graphene-like planar quantum electrodynamics model.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.