Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Rotation related systematic effects in a cold atom interferometer onboard a Nadir pointing satellite

arXiv
Authors: Quentin Beaufils, Julien Lefebve, Joel Gomes Baptista, Raphaël Piccon, Valentin Cambier, Leonid A. Sidorenkov, Christine Fallet, Thomas Lévèque, Franck Pereira Dos Santos

Year

2022

Paper ID

14124

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study the effects of rotations on a cold atom accelerometer onboard a Nadir pointing satellite. A simulation of the satellite attitude combined with a calculation of the phase of the cold atom interferometer allow us to evaluate the noise and bias induced by rotations. In particular, we evaluate the effects associated to the active compensation of the rotation due to Nadir pointing. This study was realized in the context of the preliminary study phase of the CARIOQA Quantum Pathfinder Mission.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the effects of rotations on a cold atom accelerometer onboard a Nadir pointing satellite.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #14124 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.