Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry Quantum Simulation

Hole- and electron-vibrational couplings in oligoacene crystals: intramolecular contributions.

PubMed
Authors: Coropceanu V, Malagoli M, da Silva Filho DA, Gruhn NE, Bill TG, Brédas JL

Year

2002

Paper ID

13062

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

68

Citations

399

Abstract

The hole-vibrational coupling is reported for anthracene, tetracene, and pentacene on the basis of a joint experimental and theoretical study of ionization spectra using high-resolution gas-phase photoelectron spectroscopy and first-principles correlated quantum-mechanical calculations. The hole-vibrational coupling is found to be significantly smaller than the electron-vibrational coupling in the case of these oligomers; however, both quantities are predicted to converge to the same value when increasing the chain length.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2002 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The hole-vibrational coupling is reported for anthracene, tetracene, and pentacene on the basis of a joint experimental and theoretical study of ionization spectra using...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13062 #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc... #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-22 12:12:01

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.