Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

High temperature gate control of quantum well spin memory.

PubMed
Authors: Karimov OZ, John GH, Harley RT, Lau WH, Flatté ME, Henini M, Airey R

Year

2003

Paper ID

13014

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Time-resolved optical measurements in (110)-oriented GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells show a tenfold increase of the spin-relaxation rate as a function of applied electric field from 20 to 80 kV cm(-1) at 170 K and indicate a similar variation at 300 K, in agreement with calculations based on the Rashba effect. Spin relaxation is almost field independent below 20 kV cm(-1) reflecting quantum well interface asymmetry. The results indicate the achievability of a voltage-gateable spin-memory time longer than 3 ns simultaneously with a high electron mobility.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2003 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Time-resolved optical measurements in (110)-oriented GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells show a tenfold increase of the spin-relaxation rate as a function of applied electric field from...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13014 #69042 Simultaneous Fragment Docking f... #69037 Spin dynamics and ortho-para co... #69012 Projector Quantum Variational A... #69006 Elucidating the Control of Circ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.