Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Teleportation in a noisy environment: a quantum trajectories approach.

PubMed
Authors: Carlo GG, Benenti G, Casati G

Year

2003

Paper ID

12975

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

85

Citations

44

Abstract

We study the fidelity of quantum teleportation for the situation in which quantum logic gates are used to provide the long distance entanglement required in the protocol, and where the effect of a noisy environment is modeled by means of a generalized amplitude damping channel. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of the quantum trajectories approach, which allows the simulation of open systems with a large number of qubits (up to 24). This shows that the method is suitable for modeling quantum information protocols in realistic environments.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2003 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the fidelity of quantum teleportation for the situation in which quantum logic gates are used to provide the long distance entanglement required in the protocol, and...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #12975 #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69023 Scalable Quantum Algorithms for... #68990 Driving Exchange Interaction in... #68985 Floquet Entanglement Generation...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-19 08:03:54

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.