Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Simulation
Separation of 47Ti and 49Ti solid-state NMR lineshapes by static QCPMG experiments at multiple fields.
PubMed
Authors: Larsen FH, Farnan I, Lipton AS
Year
2006
Paper ID
12825
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
173
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Experimental procedures are proposed and demonstrated that separate the spectroscopic contribution from both (47)Ti and (49)Ti in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. These take advantage of the different nuclear spin quantum numbers of these isotopes that lead to different "effective" radiofrequency fields for the central transition nutation frequencies when these nuclei occur in sites with a significant electric field gradient. Numerical simulations and solid-state NMR experiments were performed on the TiO(2) polymorphs anatase and rutile. For anatase, the separation of the two isotopes at high field (21.1T) facilitated accurate determination of the electric field gradient (EFG) and chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) tensors. This was accomplished by taking advantage of the quadrupolar interaction between the EFG at the titanium site and the different magnitudes of the nuclear quadrupole moments (Q) of the two isotopes. Rutile, having a larger quadrupolar coupling constant (C(Q)), was examined by (49)Ti-selective experiments at different magnetic fields to obtain spectra with different scalings of the two anisotropic tensors. A small chemical shielding anisotropy (CSA) of -30 ppm was determined.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2006 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Experimental procedures are proposed and demonstrated that separate the spectroscopic contribution from both (47)Ti and (49)Ti in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectra.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.