Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum chemical, ballistic and explosivity calculations on 2,4,6,8-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraaza cyclooctatetraene: a new high energy molecule.
PubMed
Authors: Gejji SP, Talawar MB, Mukundan T, Kurian EM
Year
2006
Paper ID
12760
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
156
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Ab initio molecular orbital calculations have been carried out on 2,4,6,8-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctatetraene, the tetramer of the series (NO(2)CN)(n) where n=1-4, using the Hartree-Fock theory with the 6-31 G(d) basis set. These calculations yield three conformers for the tetramer with D(4h), C(4h) and C(2) symmetries. The nonplanar conformer with the C(2) symmetry turns out to be 99.0 and 164.4kJmol(-1), respectively, lower in energy than the C(4h) and D(4h) conformers. The electron density topography - the density at the bond critical point - has been used as a measure of the CNO(2) strengths. Based on these bond strengths, heats of formation [obtained from the parametric model 3 (PM3) method] and specific decomposition energies, it may be concluded that (NO(2)CN)(4) is a promising candidate in the class of high energy molecules. Theoretically computed explosive (velocity of detonation, detonation pressure, etc.) and ballistic (characteristic velocity, specific impulse, etc.) parameters support these conclusions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2006 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Ab initio molecular orbital calculations have been carried out on 2,4,6,8-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctatetraene, the tetramer of the series (NO(2)CN)(n) where n=1-4...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.