Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
Gravitational Backreaction is Magical
Crossref
Authors: ChunJun Cao, Gong Cheng, Alioscia Hamma, Lorenzo Leone, William Munizzi, Savatore F.E. Oliviero
Year
2025
Paper ID
11655
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
164
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the interplay between magic and entanglement in quantum many-body systems. We show that nonlocal magic, which is supported by the quantum correlations is lower bounded by the nonflatness of entanglement spectrum and upper bounded by the amount of entanglement in the system. We then argue that a smoothed version of nonlocal magic bounds the hardness of classical simulations for incompressible states. In conformal field theories (CFTs), we conjecture that the nonlocal magic should scale linearly with entanglement entropy but sublinearly when an approximation of the state is allowed. We support the conjectures using both analytical arguments based on unitary distillation and numerical data from an Ising CFT. If the CFT has a holographic dual, then we prove that the nonlocal magic vanishes if and only if there is no gravitational backreaction. Furthermore, we show that nonlocal magic is approximately equal to the rate of change of the minimal surface area in response to the change of cosmic brane tension in the bulk.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the interplay between magic and entanglement in quantum many-body systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.