You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Simulation Quantum Foundations

Lower bound for the mean square distance between classical and quantum spin correlations

arXiv
Authors: Gebhard Gruebl, Lukas Wurzer

Year

2010

Paper ID

10508

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

66

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Bell's theorem prevents local Kolmogorov-simulations of the singlet state of two spin-1/2 particles. We derive a positive lower bound for the L2%-distance between the quantum mechanical spin singlet anticorrelation function cos and any of its classical approximants C formed by the stationary autocorrelation functions of mean-square-continuous, -periodic, pm1-valued, stochastic processes. This bound is given by Vert C-cosVert geq\(1-frac{8}{π2}\) /sqrt{2}approx0.133 95.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Bell's theorem prevents local Kolmogorov-simulations of the singlet state of two spin-1/2 particles.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10508 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.