Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Superconducting Qubits
Low Latency GNN Accelerator for Quantum Error Correction
arXiv
Authors: Alessio Cicero, Luigi Altamura, Moritz Lange, Mats Granath, Pedro Trancoso
Year
2026
Paper ID
35841
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
208
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum computers have the potential to solve certain complex problems in a much more efficient way than classical computers. Nevertheless, current quantum computer implementations are limited by high physical error rates. This issue is addressed by Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes, which use multiple physical qubits to form a logical qubit to achieve a lower logical error rate, with the surface code being one of the most commonly used. The most time-critical step in this process is interpreting the measurements of the physical qubits to determine which errors have most likely occurred - a task called decoding. Consequently, the main challenge for QEC is to achieve error correction with high accuracy within the tight $1μs$ decoding time budget imposed by superconducting qubits. State-of-the-art QEC approaches trade accuracy for latency. In this work, we propose an FPGA accelerator for a Neural Network based decoder as a way to achieve a lower logical error rate than current methods within the tight time constraint, for code distance up to d=7. We achieved this goal by applying different hardware-aware optimizations to a high-accuracy GNN-based decoder. In addition, we propose several accelerator optimizations leading to the FPGA-based decoder achieving a latency smaller than $1μs$, with a lower error rate compared to the state-of-the-art.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.