Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Quantum Simulation
No More Hooks in the Surface Code: Distance-Preserving Syndrome Extraction for Arbitrary Layouts at Minimum Depth
arXiv
Authors: Yuga Hirai, Shota Ikari, Yosuke Ueno, Yasunari Suzuki
Year
2026
Paper ID
22489
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
200
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Hook errors are a major challenge in implementing logical operations with the surface code, because they can reduce the fault distance below the code distance. This motivates syndrome-extraction circuits that suppress hook-error effects for the stabilizer layouts that appear during logical operations. However, the existing methods either increase circuit depth or require simultaneous execution of measurements and CNOT gates, both of which introduce additional overheads and degrade the threshold. We propose the ZX interleaving syndrome extraction, which preserves the full fault distance $d$ for any surface-code layout with regular stabilizer tiles at minimum depth, i.e., four layers of CNOT gates, without requiring additional circuit depth or simultaneous execution of measurements and CNOT gates. The key idea is to interleave the Z and X stabilizer tiles so that hook-error edges in the decoding graph are shortened and effectively eliminated. Numerical simulations under uniform depolarizing noise for memory and lattice-surgery experiments confirm that the proposed method achieves a full fault distance of $d$, whereas the best existing minimum-depth approach achieves $d-1$. Since the full fault distance is achievable for any regular tiling layout of the surface code, the proposed method may serve as an indispensable technique for practical fault-tolerant quantum computation.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.