Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
π-π Stacking Determines the Selectivity of Unnatural DNA Base Pairs Even without Polymerase.
PubMed
Authors: Noori Z, Bermejo A, Bofill JM, Poater J
Year
2026
Paper ID
9686
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
177
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Expanding the genetic alphabet requires a mechanistic understanding of how synthetic bases are faithfully replicated alongside natural DNA. We present a quantum chemical study reproducing the experimentally observed single-nucleotide incorporation selectivity of Hirao's unnatural base pairs (UBPs) by the 3'-5' exonuclease-deficient Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. Our analysis focuses on the highly selective DsPx pair, benchmarking its behavior against canonical Watson-Crick pairs and other UBPs. Strikingly, the observed selectivity emerges without explicitly modeling the polymerase, relying solely on computed stacking energies within the DNA helix. Molecular orbital and energy-decomposition analyses show that both electrostatic and dispersion interactions strengthen DsPx's affinity more, capturing experimental fidelity trends and explaining its superior performance relative to related systems. We further evaluate other selective UBPs, including QPa, DsPa, and DsPn. Together, these results provide a quantitative framework for UBP incorporation selectivity and highlight the crucial role of noncovalent interactions in stabilizing synthetic bases within DNA. By bridging computation and experiment, this work advances design principles for synthetic genetic systems and contributes to unraveling the molecular origins of DNA replication fidelity.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Expanding the genetic alphabet requires a mechanistic understanding of how synthetic bases are faithfully replicated alongside natural DNA.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.