Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
When Better Quenching Means Lower Yields: Electrostatic Control of Cage Escape.
PubMed
Authors: Bianco A, Natali M, Bergamini G
Year
2026
Paper ID
9683
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
196
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Photoredox catalysis often relies on excited-state quenching data to rationalize performance, yet such metrics can obscure the impact of solvent cage escape on overall efficiency. We report a systematic study of the effect of electrostatic interactions on the excited-state quenching, cage escape, and back-electron transfer processes in a benchmark system comprising methyl viologen (MV) and differently carboxylated ruthenium polypyridyl complexes with net charges from 2+ to 4-. Increasing electrostatic attraction between photosensitizer and MV enhances the quenching rate constant ( ) up to the diffusion limit but simultaneously suppresses cage escape quantum yields, resulting in an inverse correlation between and photochemical MV production. Transient absorption spectroscopy confirms that cage escape, rather than quenching or back-electron transfer, governs the quantum yield of product formation. Protonation of carboxylate groups to yield uniformly 2+ complexes equalizes quenching rates and substantially increases cage escape efficiency for the originally anionic species. These results establish electrostatic control of charge separation as a decisive factor in photoredox catalysis and challenge the practice of predicting yields solely from quenching experiments. Consideration of both the initial and post-electron-transfer charges of the photocatalyst/quencher pair emerges as a general design principle for maximizing cage escape and, consequently, photoredox reaction efficiency.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Photoredox catalysis often relies on excited-state quenching data to rationalize performance, yet such metrics can obscure the impact of solvent cage escape on overall efficiency.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.