Quick Navigation

Topics

Neutral Atom Rydberg Quantum Computing

Terahertz receiver based on room-temperature Rydberg-atoms.

PubMed
Authors: Lin YY, She ZY, Chen ZW, Li XZ, Zhang CX, Liao KY, Zhang XD, Chen JH, Huang W, Yan H, Zhu SL

Year

2025

Paper ID

965

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

102

Citations

14

Abstract

Realization of practical terahertz wireless communications still faces many challenges. The receiver with high sensitivity is important for THz wireless communications. Here we demonstrate a terahertz receiver based on the cesium Rydberg atoms in a room-temperature vapor cell. The minimum detectable THz electric field is calibrated. With this receiver, the phase-sensitive conversion of amplitude-modulated or frequency-modulated terahertz waves into optical signals is performed. The results show that the atomic receiver has many advantages due to its quantum properties. Particularly, the long distance THz wireless communications is achievable using this receiver. Furthermore, the atomic receiver can be used in the THz wireless-to-optical link.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Neutral-Atom & Rydberg Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Realization of practical terahertz wireless communications still faces many challenges.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #965

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-11 07:59:53

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.