Quick Navigation
Topics
Qldpc Advanced Quantum Codes
Quantum Compilation Routing Architecture
The Pinnacle Architecture: Reducing the cost of breaking RSA-2048 to 100 000 physical qubits using quantum LDPC codes
arXiv
Authors: Paul Webster, Lucas Berent, Omprakash Chandra, Evan T. Hockings, Nouédyn Baspin, Felix Thomsen, Samuel C. Smith, Lawrence Z. Cohen
Year
2026
Paper ID
94
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The realisation of utility-scale quantum computing inextricably depends on the design of practical, low-overhead fault-tolerant architectures. We introduce the Pinnacle Architecture, which uses quantum low-density parity check (QLDPC) codes to allow for universal, fault-tolerant quantum computation with a spacetime overhead significantly smaller than that of any competing architecture. With this architecture, we show that 2048-bit RSA integers can be factored with less than one hundred thousand physical qubits, given a physical error rate of 10-3, code cycle time of 1 \textmu s and a reaction time of 10 \textmu s. We thereby demonstrate the feasibility of utility-scale quantum computing with an order of magnitude fewer physical qubits than has previously been believed necessary.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Compilation, Routing & Architecture research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The realisation of utility-scale quantum computing inextricably depends on the design of practical, low-overhead fault-tolerant architectures.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.