Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry Quantum Foundations

Non-classical correlations from dissociation time entanglement

arXiv
Authors: Clemens Gneiting, Klaus Hornberger

Year

2009

Paper ID

9267

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

84

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We discuss a strongly entangled two-particle state of motion that emerges naturally from the double-pulse dissociation of a diatomic molecule. This state, which may be called dissociation-time entangled, permits the unambiguous demonstration of non-classical correlations by violating a Bell inequality based on switched single particle interferometry and only position measurements. We apply time-dependent scattering theory to determine the detrimental effect of dispersion. The proposed setup brings into reach the possibility of establishing non-classical correlations with respect to system properties that are truly macroscopically distinct.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2009 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We discuss a strongly entangled two-particle state of motion that emerges naturally from the double-pulse dissociation of a diatomic molecule.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #9267 #69042 Simultaneous Fragment Docking f... #69037 Spin dynamics and ortho-para co... #69036 CARVE-Q: Quantum-Proposed, Clas... #69035 A Modular Approach to Succinct ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.