Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Suppression of nuclear spin diffusion at a GaAs/AlGaAs interface measured with a single quantum dot nano-probe
arXiv
Authors: A. E. Nikolaenko, E. A. Chekhovich, M. N. Makhonin, I. W. Drouzas, A. B. Vankov, J. Skiba-Szymanska, M. S. Skolnick, P. Senellart, A. Lemaitre, A. I. Tartakovskii
Year
2009
Paper ID
9265
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
72
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Nuclear spin polarization dynamics are measured in optically pumped individual GaAs/AlGaAs interface quantum dots by detecting the time-dependence of the Overhauser shift in photoluminescence (PL) spectra. Long nuclear polarization decay times of 1 minute have been found indicating inefficient nuclear spin diffusion from the GaAs dot into the surrounding AlGaAs matrix in externally applied magnetic field. A spin diffusion coefficient two orders lower than that previously found in bulk GaAs is deduced.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Spin Qubits & Silicon Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2009 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Nuclear spin polarization dynamics are measured in optically pumped individual GaAs/AlGaAs interface quantum dots by detecting the time-dependence of the Overhauser shift in...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.