Quick Navigation
Topics
Photonic Quantum Computing
Nonclassical 2-photon interference with separate intrinsically narrowband fibre sources
arXiv
Authors: Matthaeus Halder, Jeremie Fulconis, Ben Cemlyn, Alex Clark, Chunle Xiong, William J. Wadsworth, John G. Rarity
Year
2009
Paper ID
9225
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper, we demonstrate a source of photon pairs based on four-wave-mixing in photonic crystal fibres. Careful engineering of the phase matching conditions in the fibres enables us to create photon pairs at 597 nm and 860 nm in an intrinsically factorable state showing no spectral correlations. This allows for heralding one photon in a pure state and hence renders narrow band filtering obsolete. The source is narrow band, bright and achieves an overall detection efficiency of up to 21% per photon. For the first time, a Hong-Ou-Mandel interference with unfiltered photons from separate fibre sources is presented.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2009 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper, we demonstrate a source of photon pairs based on four-wave-mixing in photonic crystal fibres.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.