Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Foundations

Non-homogeneous Bell-type Inequalities for Two- and Three-qubit States

arXiv

Authors: Mingjun Shi, Changliang Ren, Jiangfeng Du

Year

2009

Paper ID

9203

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

A systematic approach is presented to construct non-homogeneous two- and three-qubit Bell-type inequalities. When projector-like terms are subtracted from homogeneous two-qubit CHSH polynomial, non-homogeneous inequalities are attained and the maximal quantum mechanical violation asymptotically equals a constant with the subtracted terms becoming sufficiently large. In the case of three-qubit system, it is found that most significant three-qubit inequalities presented in literature can be recovered in our framework. We aslo discuss the behavior of such inequalities in the loophole-free Bell test and obtain corresponding thresholds of detection efficiency.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2009 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
A systematic approach is presented to construct non-homogeneous two- and three-qubit Bell-type inequalities.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:0901.3253 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.3253 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.3253

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.