Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Teleportation via a mixture of a two qubit subsystem of a N-qubit W and GHZ state

arXiv
Authors: Indranil Chakrabarty

Year

2009

Paper ID

9129

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

109

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this work we study a state which is a random mixture of a two qubit subsystem of a N-qubit W state and GHZ state. We analyze several possibilities like separability criterion (Peres-Horodecki criterion [14,15]), non violation of Bell's inequality [6](M(ρ)<1)and teleportation fidelity [1,2,3,4] $(Fmax>{2/3}) for this state. We also obtain a relationship betweenN(number of qubits) andp(the classical probability of random mixture) for each of these possibilities. Finally we present a detailed analysis of all these possibilities forN=3,4,5qubit systems. We also report that for N=3 andp\in(.75,1]$, this entangled state can be used as a teleportation channel without violating Bell's inequality.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2009 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work we study a state which is a random mixture of a two qubit subsystem of a N-qubit W state and GHZ state.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #9129 #69036 CARVE-Q: Quantum-Proposed, Clas... #69035 A Modular Approach to Succinct ... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68989 Quantum correlations in QBism's...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.