Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Chemistry
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Thermal entanglement of Hubbard dimers in the nonextensive statistics
arXiv
Authors: Hideo Hasegawa
Year
2010
Paper ID
9061
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
120
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The thermal entanglement of the Hubbard dimer (two-site Hubbard model) has been studied with the nonextensive statistics. We have calculated the auto-correlation $Oq$, pair correlation $Lq$, concurrence $Γq$ and conditional entropy $Rq$ as functions of entropic index q and the temperature T. The thermal entanglement is shown to considerably depend on the entropic index. For q < 1.0, the threshold temperature where Γq vanishes or Rq changes its sign is more increased and the entanglement may survive at higher temperatures than for q=1.0. Relations among Lq, Γq and Rq are investigated. The physical meaning of the entropic index q is discussed with the microcanonical and superstatistical approaches. The nonextensive statistics is applied also to Heisenberg dimers.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The thermal entanglement of the Hubbard dimer (two-site Hubbard model) has been studied with the nonextensive statistics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.