Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Statistical mechanics of Monte Carlo sampling and the sign problem
arXiv
Authors: Gustavo During, Jorge Kurchan
Year
2010
Paper ID
9018
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
128
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Monte Carlo sampling of any system may be analyzed in terms of an associated glass model - a variant of the Random Energy Model - with, whenever there is a sign problem, complex fields. This model has three types of phases (liquid, frozen and `chaotic'), as is characteristic of glass models with complex parameters. Only the liquid one yields the correct answers for the original problem, and the task is to design the simulation to stay inside it. The statistical convergence of the sampling to the correct expectation values may be studied in these terms, yielding a general lower bound for the computer time as a function of the free energy difference between the true system, and a reference one. In this way, importance-sampling strategies may be optimized.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Monte Carlo sampling of any system may be analyzed in terms of an associated glass model - a variant of the Random Energy Model - with, whenever there is a sign problem...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.