Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

Resonator/zero-Qubit architecture for superconducting qubits

arXiv
Authors: Andrei Galiautdinov, Alexander N. Korotkov, John M. Martinis

Year

2011

Paper ID

8743

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

101

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We analyze the performance of the Resonator/zero-Qubit (RezQu) architecture in which the qubits are complemented with memory resonators and coupled via a resonator bus. Separating the stored information from the rest of the processing circuit by at least two coupling steps and the zero qubit state results in a significant increase of the ON/OFF ratio and the reduction of the idling error. Assuming no decoherence, we calculate such idling error, as well as the errors for the MOVE operation and tunneling measurement, and show that the RezQu architecture can provide high fidelity performance required for medium-scale quantum information processing.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We analyze the performance of the Resonator/zero-Qubit (RezQu) architecture in which the qubits are complemented with memory resonators and coupled via a resonator bus.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #8743 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78829 Graphene double quantum dot as ... #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78809 A quasiparticle-protected super...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.