Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Lossy Quantum Optical Metrology with Squeezed States
arXiv
Authors: Xiao-Xiao Zhang, Yu-Xiang Yang, Xiang-Bin Wang
Year
2012
Paper ID
8692
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
118
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the precise phase estimation using squeezed states with photon losses present. Our exact quantum Fisher information calculation shows significant quantum enhancement and thus reveals the benchmark for practical quantum metrology in this noisy scenario. However, we find that the existing parity measurement scheme [P.M. Anisimov et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 103602 (2010)] behaves worse than even classical cases given very small losses, unless we take an appropriate loss dependent phase shift. Using our formulae, the two optimized aspects including the pre-detection phase shift and the consequent light intensity of a tradeoff strategy for photon resource arrangement can be both calculated. Therefore our result makes it possible to experimentally realize quantum metrology of phase estimation with squeezed states.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2012 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the precise phase estimation using squeezed states with photon losses present.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.