Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Conjugates, Filters and Quantum Mechanics
arXiv
Authors: Alexander Wilce
Year
2012
Paper ID
8621
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
240
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Jordan structure of finite-dimensional quantum theory is derived, in a conspicuously easy way, from a few simple postulates concerning abstract probabilistic models (each defined by a set of basic measurements and a convex set of states). The key assumption is that each system A can be paired with an isomorphic textit{conjugate} system, overline{A}, by means of a non-signaling bipartite state ηA perfectly and uniformly correlating each basic measurement on A with its counterpart on overline{A}. In the case of a quantum-mechanical system associated with a complex Hilbert space mathcal H, the conjugate system is that associated with the conjugate Hilbert space overline{mathcal H}, and ηA corresponds to the standard maximally entangled EPR state on {mathcal H} otimes overline{mathcal H}. A second ingredient is the notion of a textit{reversible filter}, that is, a probabilistically reversible process that independently attenuates the sensitivity of detectors associated with a measurement. In addition to offering more flexibility than most existing reconstructions of finite-dimensional quantum theory, the approach taken here has the advantage of not relying on any form of the "no restriction" hypothesis. That is, it is not assumed that arbitrary effects are physically measurable, nor that arbitrary families of physically measurable effects summing to the unit effect, represent physically accessible observables. An appendix shows how a version of Hardy's "subspace axiom" can replace several assumptions native to this paper, although at the cost of disallowing superselection rules.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2012 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Jordan structure of finite-dimensional quantum theory is derived, in a conspicuously easy way, from a few simple postulates concerning abstract probabilistic models (each...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.