Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Optimally combining dynamical decoupling and quantum error correction

arXiv
Authors: G. A. Paz-Silva, D. A. Lidar

Year

2012

Paper ID

8574

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

108

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We show how dynamical decoupling (DD) and quantum error correction (QEC) can be optimally combined in the setting of fault tolerant quantum computing. To this end we identify the optimal generator set of DD sequences designed to protect quantum information encoded into stabilizer subspace or subsystem codes. This generator set, comprising the stabilizers and logical operators of the code, minimizes a natural cost function associated with the length of DD sequences. We prove that with the optimal generator set the restrictive local-bath assumption used in earlier work on hybrid DD-QEC schemes, can be significantly relaxed, thus bringing hybrid DD-QEC schemes, and their potentially considerable advantages, closer to realization.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2012 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We show how dynamical decoupling (DD) and quantum error correction (QEC) can be optimally combined in the setting of fault tolerant quantum computing.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #8574 #68397 Optimizing Parallel Execution o...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.