Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Target isolation of diverse sesquiterpenoid from the stems of Daphne genkwa based on molecular networking.

PubMed
Authors: Li JY, Wang XY, Han MJ, Bai M, Huang XX

Year

2025

Paper ID

850

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Guiding by LC-MS/MS analysis and the Global Natural Products Social (GNPS) Molecular Networking, three undescribed sesquiterpenoids, stedapgens A-C, and two known analogues were discovered in the barks of Sieb. et Zucc. The structures were determined by analysis of their spectroscopic data and quantum-chemical calculations. All the isolated novel compounds were tested for their acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities with IC = 0.754 ± 0.059, 0.696 ± 0.026, and 0.337 ± 0.023 g/ml. Among them, stedapgen A displayed promising inhibitory activities against AChE, and the binding sites were predicted by molecular docking.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Guiding by LC-MS/MS analysis and the Global Natural Products Social (GNPS) Molecular Networking, three undescribed sesquiterpenoids, stedapgens A-C, and two known analogues...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #850 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69971 Quantum-enhanced estimation of ... #69966 Schur--Horn bound on field-free... #69943 The moving Fermi polaron

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.