Quick Navigation

Topics

Topological Quantum Computing Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Quantum frameness for Charge-Parity-Time inversion symmetry

arXiv
Authors: Michael Skotiniotis, Borzu Toloui, Ian T. Durham, Barry C. Sanders

Year

2013

Paper ID

8374

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

72

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We develop a theory of charge-parity-time (CPT) frameness resources to circumvent CPT-superselection. We construct and quantify such resources for spin 0, frac{1}{2}, 1, and Majorana particles and show that quantum information processing is possible even with CPT superselection. Our method employs a unitary representation of CPT inversion by considering the aggregate action of CPT rather than the composition of separate C, P and T operations, as some of these operations involve problematic anti-unitary representations.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We develop a theory of charge-parity-time (CPT) frameness resources to circumvent CPT-superselection.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #8374 #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68426 On the Approximate Non-Determin... #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.