Quick Navigation

Topics

Topological Quantum Computing Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

C1-classification of gapped parent Hamiltonians of quantum spin chains

arXiv
Authors: Sven Bachmann, Yoshiko Ogata

Year

2014

Paper ID

8308

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

77

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We consider the C1-classification of gapped Hamiltonians introduced in [Fannes-Nachtergaele-Werner, Nachtergaele] as parents Hamiltonians of translation invariant finitely correlated states. Within this family, we show that the number of edge modes, which is equal at the left and right edge, is the complete invariant. The construction proves that translation invariance of the `bulk' ground state does not need to be broken to establish C1-equivalence, namely that the spin chain does not need to be blocked.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We consider the C^1-classification of gapped Hamiltonians introduced in [Fannes-Nachtergaele-Werner, Nachtergaele] as parents Hamiltonians of translation invariant finitely...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #8308 #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69015 Complex-gauge control of anomal... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.