Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Control Pulse Engineering
A general formulation of time-optimal quantum control and optimality of singular protocols
arXiv
Authors: Hiroaki Wakamura, Tatsuhiko Koike
Year
2019
Paper ID
828
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
207
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a general theoretical framework for finding the time-optimal unitary evolution of the quantum systems when the Hamiltonian is subject to arbitrary constraints. Quantum brachistochrone (QB) is such a framework based on the variational principle, whose drawback is that it deals with equality constraints only. While inequality constraints can be reduced to equality ones in some situations, there are situations where they cannot, especially when a drift field is present in the Hamiltonian. The drift which we cannot control appears in a wide range of systems. We first develop a framework based on Pontryagin's maximum principle (MP) in order to deal with inequality constraints as well. The new framework contains QB as a special case, and their detailed correspondence is given. Second, using this framework, we discuss general relations among the drift, the singular controls, and the inequality constraints. The singular controls are those that satisfy MP trivially so as to cause a trouble in determining the optimal protocol. Third, to overcome this issue, we derive an additional necessary condition for a singular protocol to be optimal by applying the generalized Legendre-Clebsch condition. This condition in particular reveals the physical meaning of singular controls. Finally, we demonstrate how our framework and results work in some examples.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Control & Pulse Engineering research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a general theoretical framework for finding the time-optimal unitary evolution of the quantum systems when the Hamiltonian is subject to arbitrary constraints.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.