Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Thermodynamics Quantum Foundations

EPR Paradox and Magician's Props

arXiv

Authors: Liangsuo Shu, Shiping Jin, Xiaokang Liu, Suyi Huang, Zhidong Zeng, Alice Fox, Kun Li, Jingyi Tan

Year

2014

Paper ID

8164

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Local realism has been knocked down by the experiments with entangled pairs of particles based on Bell's theorem(J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964)). However, there has been continuing debate on whether locality or realism is the problem. In this work, we analyzed the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought experiment of Bohm's version using information theory and thermodynamics. The inference of non-locality from EPR experiments will be against the principle of non-realism of quantum mechanics. Therefore, the experiments about quantum entanglement cannot provide any proof to accuse locality.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
Local realism has been knocked down by the experiments with entangled pairs of particles based on Bell's theorem(J.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1407.6087 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.6087 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.6087

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.