You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Bosonic Continuous Variable Quantum Computing
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Photonic Quantum Computing
Quantum bit commitment with cheat sensitive binding and approximate sealing
arXiv
Authors: Yan-Bing Li, Sheng-Wei Xu, Wei Huang, Zhong-Jie Wan
Year
2014
Paper ID
8115
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
79
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper proposes a cheat sensitive quantum bit commitment (CSQBC) scheme based on single photons, in which Alice commits a bit to Bob. Here, Bob only can cheat the committed bit with probability close to 0 with the increasing of used single photons' amount. And if Alice altered her committed bit after commitment phase, she will be detected with probability close to 1 with the increasing of used single photons' amount. The scheme is easy to be realized with nowadays technology.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper proposes a cheat sensitive quantum bit commitment (CSQBC) scheme based on single photons, in which Alice commits a bit to Bob.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.