You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Bosonic Continuous Variable Quantum Computing Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Photonic Quantum Computing

Quantum bit commitment with cheat sensitive binding and approximate sealing

arXiv
Authors: Yan-Bing Li, Sheng-Wei Xu, Wei Huang, Zhong-Jie Wan

Year

2014

Paper ID

8115

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

79

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This paper proposes a cheat sensitive quantum bit commitment (CSQBC) scheme based on single photons, in which Alice commits a bit to Bob. Here, Bob only can cheat the committed bit with probability close to 0 with the increasing of used single photons' amount. And if Alice altered her committed bit after commitment phase, she will be detected with probability close to 1 with the increasing of used single photons' amount. The scheme is easy to be realized with nowadays technology.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This paper proposes a cheat sensitive quantum bit commitment (CSQBC) scheme based on single photons, in which Alice commits a bit to Bob.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #8115 #69032 Beyond the Canonical Protocol: ... #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.