Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning Superconducting Qubits

Quantum Cryptography: where do we stand?

arXiv
Authors: Nicolas Gisin

Year

2015

Paper ID

8025

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In the last few years the world in which Quantum Cryptography evolves has deeply changed. On the one side the revelations of Snowden, though he said nothing really new, made the world more aware of the importance to protect sensitive data from all kinds of adversaries, including sometimes "friends." On the other side, breakthroughs in quantum computation, in particular in superconducting qubits and surface-codes, made it possible that in 15 to 25 years there might be a quantum machine able to break today's codes. This implies that in order to protect today's data over a few decades, one has to act now and use some quantum-safe cryptography.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In the last few years the world in which Quantum Cryptography evolves has deeply changed.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #8025 #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69025 Machine-Learning Optimization a... #69022 Contacting Josephson Junctions ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.