Quick Navigation
Topics
Topological Quantum Computing
Statistics of fractionalized excitations through threshold spectroscopy
arXiv
Authors: Siddhardh C. Morampudi, Ari M. Turner, Frank Pollmann, Frank Wilczek
Year
2016
Paper ID
7899
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
91
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We show that the anyonic statistics of fractionalized excitations display characteristic signatures in threshold spectroscopic measurements. Drawing motivation from topologically ordered phases such as gapped quantum spin liquids and fractional chern insulators which possess fractionalized excitations, we consider gapped systems with abelian anyonic excitations. The low energy onset of associated correlation functions near the threshold show universal behaviour depending on the statistics of the anyons. This explains some recent theoretical results in spin systems and also provides a route towards detecting statistics in experiments such as neutron scattering and tunneling spectroscopy.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Topological Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We show that the anyonic statistics of fractionalized excitations display characteristic signatures in threshold spectroscopic measurements.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.