!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Networks Quantum Simulation

Generalised Bit-Vector Abstractions for Formal Verification of Quantum Error-Detection and Entanglement Circuits over {H,X,C-NOT}: CSS Constructions, Soundness, and Mutation-Based Validation

arXiv
Authors: Arun Govindankutty

Year

2026

Paper ID

78716

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

245

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Formal verification of quantum circuits becomes difficult as circuit size grows because exhaustive reasoning over the Hilbert space is computationally expensive. In previous work [1], we introduced a bit-vector abstraction that separates superposition tracking from basis-state behavior, enabling SMT-based verification of fixed-size error-detection and entanglement circuits built from H, X, and C-NOT gates. This paper extends the framework in five directions. First, we generalise correctness properties to parametrised repetition and concatenated phase-flip codes with up to 101 logical elements. Second, we verify syndrome extraction for CSS codes specified by arbitrary parity-check matrices, including the Steane, [[15,7,3]] Hamming, [[15,1,3]] Reed-Muller, and rotated surface codes with distances up to 101. We consider arbitrary error patterns, detection up to a specified weight, and recovery using a classical decoder, with counterexamples beyond each code's correction or detection capability. Third, we characterize the {H,X,C-NOT} fragment for which the abstraction faithfully represents Hilbert-space semantics. We prove soundness, demonstrate necessity with counterexamples, validate the characterisation against state-vector simulation, and prove the six lemmas from the original work. Fourth, a mutation study using 13 operators identifies equivalent mutants and detects all 622 non-equivalent mutants within the evaluated fault model. Fifth, a direct Z3 implementation verifies GHZ circuits with up to 262,144 qubits across three topologies on a 16GB laptop. Random H+C-NOT networks show verification cost rises sharply with depth when outputs depend on many inputs. The approach does not target general stabilizer circuits, Y-type stabilizers, fault-tolerant protocols, or physical noise; we identify extensions needed to address these cases.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Formal verification of quantum circuits becomes difficult as circuit size grows because exhaustive reasoning over the Hilbert space is computationally expensive.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #78716 #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78790 Structured leakage in OAM-encod... #78788 Geometry-optimized hyperbolic c... #78783 Scaling Quantum Optimization to...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.