Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Gaussian Fisher Information Is Superadditive
arXiv
Authors: Jiaxin Liu, Zuoxian Wang, Danyue Ma
Year
2026
Paper ID
78706
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
218
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum Fisher information adds over independent probes, so a single parameter is best measured probe by probe. We show that Gaussian measurements, the linear optics and homodyne detection of optical and microwave experiments, break this rule: two independent modes are better measured together. The uncertainty principle leaves a linear detector half of phase space, and for two modes the choice of half is a resource. Bell homodyne, a balanced beam splitter followed by two homodyne detectors, beats the best separate readout when the modes differ in quadrature width and in how the width responds to the parameter. Heterodyne detection splits a mode on a beam splitter to read both quadratures and pays one unit of vacuum noise for the empty port. Bell homodyne fills that port with the second mode, so the noise turns into signal. We prove that the gain stays below \(sqrt2-1\)2=17.157\% for every parameter carried by widths. For thermal modes at one temperature, the canonical case, a gain was conjectured impossible. We prove that any frequency difference opens a temperature window and that the gain peaks at 12.699\% at frequency ratio 3.318, where Bell homodyne is the optimal Gaussian measurement. Standard hardware reaches the gain: two coupled resonators with two homodyne detectors, or a phase-preserving amplifier whose idler band is fed by the same thermal source.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum Fisher information adds over independent probes, so a single parameter is best measured probe by probe.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.