Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Single-Shot Error Correction at Optimal Spacetime Cost
arXiv
Authors: Kishor Bharti, Tobias Haug, Derek Khu, Andrew Tanggara
Year
2026
Paper ID
78685
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
209
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recent work established that, for independent erasures, storing K logical qubits for S time steps with error at most varepsilon requires a spacetime cost of Ω\(S(K+log(S/varepsilon\))). A matching construction was also given, but assumes ideal error correction. Here we show that the same scaling can be achieved with an explicit noisy error-correction circuit and efficient decoding, counting all state-preparation, gate, measurement, and wait locations, provided that the hardware supports long-range qubit connectivity and fast, reliable classical processing. Thus, reliability adds only a logarithmic overhead shared by all stored qubits. The construction works for sufficiently weak but otherwise general circuit noise, including faults during syndrome extraction and correlated faults, and for independent erasures it matches the best known lower bound up to constant factors. We attain this scaling using quantum Tanner codes, with each memory step consisting of one round of syndrome extraction followed by a fixed number of parallel classical decoder steps that reduce the residual error enough to keep later faults correctable, regardless of memory size, storage time, or target accuracy. Together, this gives exponentially small failure probability per step while keeping the cost of each memory step linear in the code size. The same analysis also extends to certain constant-depth logical Clifford operations.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recent work established that, for independent erasures, storing K logical qubits for S time steps with error at most varepsilon requires a spacetime cost of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.