Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Connes Distance in Discrete-Time Quantum Walks
arXiv
Authors: Rayan Trabelsi, A. F. Reyes-Lega, Pablo Arrighi
Year
2026
Paper ID
78564
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
140
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the geometric spread of discrete-time quantum walks using Connes' distance formula. We introduce its discrete analogue by adapting the continuous spectral metric to the lattice, with the Dirac operator replaced by the unitary step operator. Focusing first on a (2+1)-dimensional quantum walk, we evaluate the dynamical spread of localized wavepackets to compare propagation in free space against that under a uniform magnetic field. We find that while the free walk shows linear ballistic growth, gauge-induced phases in the magnetic walk constrain the admissible test operators, suppressing the long-time geometric expansion. Furthermore, we apply this discrete framework to a (1+1)-dimensional plastic quantum walk simulating an inhomogeneous spatial metric. The results demonstrate that the discrete Connes distance naturally captures the underlying spatially varying metric, providing a robust measure of the wavepacket's spread that adapts directly to the local simulated geometry.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the geometric spread of discrete-time quantum walks using Connes' distance formula.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.