Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Near-optimal high-rate surgery from linear PCPPs
arXiv
Authors: Alexander Cowtan, Benjamin Ide
Year
2026
Paper ID
78526
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
215
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A central problem for surgery with quantum Low-Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes is the design of auxiliary systems which measure large sets of logical operators in parallel, while preserving sparsity and fault distance. We introduce a very general method for designing surgery gadgets which are 'high rate', meaning that the number of operators measured in parallel is large in comparison to the size of the auxiliary system. Given an arbitrary initial [[ n, k, d ]] quantum LDPC Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) code, and an arbitrary subcode of size mu leq n that contains t leq k logical qubits, the method produces a sparse high-rate surgery gadget with size mu \(logmu\)O\(loglog mu\)=mu1+o(1) which measures all t logicals in the subcode. The space overhead is asymptotically optimal up to subpolynomial factors, as the lower bound is Omega\(mu\). This gadget is produced in time polynomial in mu. When logical measurement is performed using these surgery gadgets, the phenomenological fault distance is at least d when performed for d rounds. Our main result comes from relating surgery gadgets with relative cosystolic expansion to linear Probabilistically Checkable Proofs of Proximity (PCPPs), which allow a randomised verifier to probabilistically verify the input to a linear circuit, using only oracle access to the input and a claimed proof.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A central problem for surgery with quantum Low-Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes is the design of auxiliary systems which measure large sets of logical operators in parallel...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.