Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Asymptotics for Frequency Redundancies in Quantum Machine Learning Models
arXiv
Authors: Felix Paul, Bhilahari Jeevanesan, Peter Jung
Year
2026
Paper ID
78441
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
167
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The redundancy distribution of the frequency spectrum has been shown in the literature to impact the expressivity and trainability of Quantum Fourier Models (QFMs). In this work, we address the question of how this redundancy spectrum is shaped by the choice of eigenvalues of the data re-uploading Hamiltonians, using a simple mathematical formalism based on generating functions. We derive exact and asymptotic redundancy profiles for several structured eigenvalue choices identical for every layer, including arithmetic progressions and single-qubit Pauli encodings, and show that both approach a Gaussian profile as the number of layers grows. We then show that this Gaussian limit is not specific to these constructions but is a generic feature of QFMs built from integer eigenvalues that are identical in every layer. These results can be tied to the central limit theorem for random walks. These results clarify why generic or unstructured encoding choices give rise to a redundancy bias that favours low frequencies, highlighting the importance of well-thought-out encoding strategies when constructing a QFM.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The redundancy distribution of the frequency spectrum has been shown in the literature to impact the expressivity and trainability of Quantum Fourier Models (QFMs).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.