Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Formulating Multistage Cutting Stock Problems as QUBO
arXiv
Authors: Marcel Seelbach Benkner, Chiara Capecci, Sebastian Nagies, Javed Akram, Sebastian Rubbert, Dimitrios Bantounas, Philipp Hauke, Michael Johanning, Michael Moeller
Year
2026
Paper ID
78241
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
180
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Cutting stock problems are of large relevance to a variety of industry branches. Here, we present a linear programming formulation for a restricted version of the multistage 2D cutting stock problem with Guillotine cuts and test it on published benchmark instances. After this, we derive a non-exact reformulation in quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) form via unbalanced penalization, which we show to have possible benefits in modeling the problem with usable leftovers. This work mainly considers the restricted formulation, in which the dimensions of each cut are determined by those of a single required piece. We further discuss how the approach can be extended to the unrestricted problem, which allows more general cutting patterns involving cuts with dimensions of multiple required pieces and naturally gives rise to quadratic terms in the inequalities of the problem formulation. We showcase solutions via a Simulated Annealing solver for the restricted problem class, where we mainly study the performance of the iterative augmented Lagrangian method. We also discuss possible applications of Quantum Annealing in this setting, as a strong motivation to research QUBO formulations.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Cutting stock problems are of large relevance to a variety of industry branches.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.